Comments on: Well, Now We Know Why Twitter Didn’t Win The Nobel Peace Prize http://FamousDC.com/2009/11/10/well-now-we-know-why-twitter-didnt-win-the-nobel-peace-prize/ Beltway talking points Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:35:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: huge fan of twitter http://FamousDC.com/2009/11/10/well-now-we-know-why-twitter-didnt-win-the-nobel-peace-prize/comment-page-1/#comment-341840 huge fan of twitter Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:10:10 +0000 http://FamousDC.com/?p=10407#comment-341840 Don't put so much weight in the raw numbers, Mr. (or Mrs.?) Capitol Cad, but more importantly as the Christian Science Monitor pointed out: "When traditional journalists were forced to leave the country, Twitter became a window for the world to view hope, heroism, and horror. It became the assignment desk, the reporter, and the producer. ... Twitter and other social media outlets have become the soft weapons of democracy." I n other words, about .027 percent of DC knows what the hell Famous DC is, but its reach is...well bad example, you guys are less than .027. Ok, off to my date! Nah, who am I kidding. Don’t put so much weight in the raw numbers, Mr. (or Mrs.?) Capitol Cad, but more importantly as the Christian Science Monitor pointed out: “When traditional journalists were forced to leave the country, Twitter became a window for the world to view hope, heroism, and horror. It became the assignment desk, the reporter, and the producer. … Twitter and other social media outlets have become the soft weapons of democracy.”
I
n other words, about .027 percent of DC knows what the hell Famous DC is, but its reach is…well bad example, you guys are less than .027.

Ok, off to my date! Nah, who am I kidding.

]]>